Totally agree with mitry... I'm actually still using v3.0! And it works
great! Fast, reliable, and sufficient for viewing photos. For more sophisticated
stuff, I then open up IrfanView (v4.0).
I use version 3.1, since it has very low memory usage, loads images fast and
there's not much hassle with configuration. It's a very good program, and has a
few good touches that the standard windows image viewing program does not
have.
Totally agree with mitry... I'm actually still using v3.0! And it works great! Fast, reliable, and sufficient for viewing photos. For more sophisticated stuff, I then open up IrfanView (v4.0).
I'm lovin' it.
I use version 3.1, since it has very low memory usage, loads images fast and there's not much hassle with configuration. It's a very good program, and has a few good touches that the standard windows image viewing program does not have.
too useful and fast
Best version is 3.1 - fast and sufficient.
Powerfull multimedia software
hmm... good
Para ver imágenes, the best.
Has a strange bug where the thumbnail view in explorer resets after opening an image in ACDsee.
I liked ACDSee - up to version 7. Versions afterwards got worse and bloated in my view (like Nero). I sought out a better, freeware alternative.
bloated, high latency, proprietary tagging system. No recommended.