Available on Mac Windows Linux

Howdy stranger! Welcome on Wakoopa

We're a social network for software. Sign up and...

Start Tracking or never show this banner again

What people think about it

Write one!
  • nitrolinken fanatic
    Features:
    Performance:
    Interface:
    Price:

    I like Songbird, I use Songbird, but still its performance isn't good nor does it boast of features (does bloat of memory usage, but nevertheless).

  • highc devotee
    Features:
    Performance:
    Interface:

    Its ok, but still very buggy. I do like the new interface over the initial release version. Still prefer itunes as my default media player for now.

  • cybersphere fanatic

    Not bad, but a complete memory hog

  • GrooveHeroine enthusiast
    Overall:

    I liked the product, but if you have a huge library like around...2,000 or 3,000 or 4,000 when I began using Songbird, it would freeze up on me.

  • Eleknide expert
    Overall:

    The idea behind Songbird is brilliant. A music player comparable to Firefox in terms of customization and ease-of-use. I really like the fact it's open source, and everyone can contribute to it (even if you're not a programmer) and the aforementioned customizability. From time to time, it isn be annoying that it's still in development, because it is still buggy, which can cause it to lag, or crash.

    Overall, to me this is a keeper, certainly because i want to get rid of Windows Media Player, hate iTunes, and don't really like Winamp.

  • Hen Asraf expert
    Overall:

    It's buggy at times, and it's not really intuitive; I mean controlling it is easy and good, but the interface itself and the performance of moving around it is kinda... Goofy. Definitely has room for improvement. It couldn't sync up with my cellphone, I have a Nokia 6280, through Bluetooth, dunno about cable. I do like the fact I can extend it, as I installed a lyric viewer and stuff like that, also it has Last.fm native support so that wasn't a problem, and is all good. It could use with some improvements, also it looks an awful lot like iTunes, which I don't like. Get creative!

    Overall it's pretty good. Though I think I'll stick to Amarok when it comes out for Windows.

  • d❤vid fanatic
    Overall:

    Finally supports last.fm!

  • Olga R. devotee
    Overall:

    It has some iffy behavior from time to time, but tries really hard to do something about it. I like it because it's not Winamp/iTunes/WMP, can be used for scrobbling (with some glitches) and has evolved for good in the last days. Also, it doesn't swallow as much virtual memory as Firefox or Flock, although it takes more space disk. And still can't use FF or Flock add-ons, its add-ons are special. Besides that, is a good browser/player.

  • izzish novice
    Overall:

    i tried to like this, but just couldn't get used to it, plus it kept crashing on me. :(

    i would love to find an alternative to itunes (grr i hate itunes), but sadly i still haven't found one.

    a nice winamp/xmms clone would be nice...

  • 88mph enthusiast
    Overall:

    0.6 is a great update, although not perfect yet. Keep up the good work guys!!

    Get involved people!!

  • gerry fanatic
    Overall:

    I've found some pretty cools stuff with this thing. I like it a lot, despite it's never ending bugs and usability issues.

  • yamee expert
    Overall:

    A great music player that works very well as an iTunes replacement. Unfortunately it often crashes, and still having few add-ons availables.

  • cpuDuDe11 fanatic
    Overall:

    Better than iTunes :)

  • jawee expert
    Overall:

    Best music player for my tastes on Windows, but not better than Amarok on Linux. However, some plug-ins are essential if you want to use an MP3 player or that sort of thing.

  • Olga R. devotee
    Overall:

    Has some stuff that's not working properly, but as we use it, we'll make it better, and there's too much to be done. Still, rocks!!